Welcome!
   You are here » Tool Reviews | Sanders - Random Orbital Sanders (9 Reviews)

Manufacturer

Model

Category

Power(watts)

Weight (kg)

E.R.P. (Inc. GST)

Metabo

FSX 200 Intec

Industrial Duty

240

1.46

$0           

Hitachi

SV13YA (H1)

Industrial Duty

230

1.6

$0           

Milwaukee

PRS 125E

Industrial Duty

200

1.76

$0           

Makita

BO 5021K

Industrial Duty

260

1.64

$0           

Festool

RO 125 FEQ Plus

Industrial Duty

500

2.3

$0           

Bosch

GEX 150 AC

Industrial Duty

340

2.5

$0           

Bosch

SXE-450 Duo

Industrial Duty

400

3.2

$0           

Festool

RO 150-5 FEQ Plus

Industrial Duty

310

2.4

$865.00           

GMC

ROS 150M

Light Duty

500

3

$0           

Note - Price & information correct at time of review. E.R.P. represents Estimated Retail Price.

For comparative purposes we have generally placed tools in the following categories. Light Duty, Trade Duty or Industrial Duty however some tools may need to cross over between categories. Click here for an explanation of these categories.

Random Orbital Sanders

In Brief.

A random orbital sander is similar in appearance to a conventional orbital sander except that it has a circular sanding pad rather than a square or rectangular pad. The reason is that the circular sanding pad rotates a full 360° as well as vibrating in small orbits. The rotation mechanism is slightly offset resulting in an ‘eccentric’ rotation of the sanding pad. For this reason, these machines are also known as dual-action or eccentric sanders.  Due to the combination of these multiple sanding actions, the random ‘scratches’ sometimes created by the sandpaper tend to be removed with each subsequent pass.

First introduced in the early 1990’s, random orbital sanders became immediately popular. They are capable of removing a large amount of stock in a shorter period of time than a conventional orbital sander, yet they are known to leave a relatively fine finish. Using a coarse grit sanding disc & a higher speed can produce a rate of material removal more similar to that of a belt sander. Using a finer sanding disc at slower speeds can result in a finish comparable to that of a fine finish orbital sander.

Random orbital sanders use sandpaper discs which are most commonly attached using the hook & loop system. The majority of these sanders are equipped with on-board dust extraction. An internal vacuum draws the sanding dust through holes already punched into the disc & pad. This dust is then either collected in an attached dust bag or fed through to a separate dust extraction canister.

The random orbital sanding head is foam-backed to enable free movement over a contoured surface. This foam helps to absorb & minimise the level of vibration experienced by the operator.

What We Did.

We reviewed two categories of random orbital sanders according to the diameter of their sanding pads -125mm & 150mm. These are the most common sizes available.

We fitted a 100 grit sanding disc to each sander &, selecting full speed, we commenced sanding a small section of seasoned hardwood.

What We Found.

We were impressed with all the machines reviewed & agreed that the playing field seemed to be relatively even.

In the 125mm category, the Hitachi SV13YA delivered an incredible performance, & at a very reasonable price.

The Festool RO125 FEQ-Plus comes with the choice of two sanding actions. It can be set on ‘coarse’ for initial rapid sanding then, at the flick of a switch, the ‘fine’ setting can provide a much finer finish to the work if required.

The Metabo SXE450 Duo does have an impressive rate of stock removal! It also provides two sanding actions but uses a different method of changing finishes to the Festool RO125 FEQ-Plus. A sometimes hard to miss red ‘booster’ button changes the orbiting diameter from a regular 2.8mm to an impressive & very aggressive 6.2mm.

Chart



Copyright Statement l Disclaimer l Privacy StatementWarranty Policy | Site by Commerce Vision Pty Ltd.  All rights reserved.
This site is best viewed at a resolution of 1024 x 768, using Internet Explorer.